Demographics details for Sandpoint, ID vs Whitehall, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sandpoint, ID vs Whitehall, WI.
| Data | Sandpoint | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,777 | 1,632 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $60,208 | $56,894 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Sandpoint vs Whitehall
- In Sandpoint, the population is higher at 9,777, compared to 1,632 in Whitehall.
- Residents in Sandpoint have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 36.8 years in Whitehall.
- Sandpoint has a higher median income of $60,208 compared to $56,894 in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sandpoint at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in Whitehall.
- Sandpoint has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Sandpoint.
Demographics
Demographics Sandpoint vs Whitehall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sandpoint | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 85 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sandpoint vs Whitehall
- In Whitehall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Sandpoint.
- Sandpoint has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 83% in Whitehall.
- The Asian population is larger in Sandpoint at 1% compared to 0% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 7% in Sandpoint.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sandpoint at 7% compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sandpoint.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sandpoint | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 24.4% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sandpoint vs Whitehall
- More residents in Sandpoint report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.2% in Whitehall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Whitehall at 24.0% versus 23.8% in Sandpoint.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sandpoint at 17.9% compared to 16.7% in Whitehall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 16.4% in Sandpoint.
- Whitehall has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 32.5% in Sandpoint.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Sandpoint.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sandpoint | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (244) | 0.4% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (1,005) | 24.4% (398) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (1,249) | 15.7% (256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (2,370) | 8.6% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sandpoint vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandpoint have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.4% in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 10.3% in Sandpoint.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Whitehall at 15.7%, compared to 12.8% in Sandpoint.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandpoint hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 8.6% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.