Demographics details for Sandpoint, ID vs Sterling, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sandpoint, ID vs Sterling, IL.
| Data | Sandpoint | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,777 | 14,566 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $60,208 | $49,007 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Sandpoint vs Sterling
- The population in Sterling is higher at 14,566, compared to 9,777 in Sandpoint.
- The median age in Sterling is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 42.4 years in Sandpoint.
- Sandpoint has a higher median income of $60,208 compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sandpoint at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
- The poverty level is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 10% in Sandpoint.
- Sterling has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Sandpoint.
Demographics
Demographics Sandpoint vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sandpoint | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 85 | 56 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sandpoint vs Sterling
- In Sterling, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Sandpoint.
- Sandpoint has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 56% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Sandpoint.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 7% in Sandpoint.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 7% in Sandpoint.
- In Sterling, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sandpoint.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sandpoint | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sandpoint vs Sterling
- More residents in Sandpoint report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.7% in Sterling.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sandpoint at 23.8% compared to 22.2% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 17.9% in Sandpoint.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling at 17.4% compared to 16.4% in Sandpoint.
- Sterling has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 32.5% in Sandpoint.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Sandpoint.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sandpoint | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (244) | 1.1% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (1,005) | 24.1% (3,511) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (1,249) | 13.8% (2,012) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (2,370) | 11.8% (1,713) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sandpoint vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandpoint have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.1% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 10.3% in Sandpoint.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling at 13.8%, compared to 12.8% in Sandpoint.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandpoint hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 11.8% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.