Demographics details for Sandpoint, ID vs Pratt, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sandpoint, ID vs Pratt, KS.
| Data | Sandpoint | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,777 | 9,067 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $60,208 | $61,685 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Sandpoint vs Pratt
- In Sandpoint, the population is higher at 9,777, compared to 9,067 in Pratt.
- Residents in Sandpoint have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 37.6 years in Pratt.
- Pratt has a higher median income of $61,685, compared to $60,208 in Sandpoint.
- In Pratt, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Sandpoint.
- The poverty level is higher in Pratt at 12%, compared to 10% in Sandpoint.
- The unemployment rate in Sandpoint is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Pratt.
Demographics
Demographics Sandpoint vs Pratt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sandpoint | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 85 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sandpoint vs Pratt
- In Pratt, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Sandpoint.
- Sandpoint has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 83% in Pratt.
- The Asian population is larger in Sandpoint at 1% compared to 0% in Pratt.
- Pratt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 7% in Sandpoint.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sandpoint at 7% compared to 6% in Pratt.
- In Pratt, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sandpoint.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sandpoint | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sandpoint vs Pratt
- More residents in Sandpoint report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.4% in Pratt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sandpoint at 23.8% compared to 19.7% in Pratt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sandpoint at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Pratt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pratt at 19.0% compared to 16.4% in Sandpoint.
- Pratt has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 32.5% in Sandpoint.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pratt at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Sandpoint.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sandpoint | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (244) | 0.2% (22) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (1,005) | 15.0% (1,362) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (1,249) | 10.3% (936) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (2,370) | 18.0% (1,634) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sandpoint vs Pratt
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandpoint have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.2% in Pratt.
- In Pratt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 10.3% in Sandpoint.
- More residents in Sandpoint have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 10.3% in Pratt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandpoint hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 18.0% in Pratt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.