Demographics details for Sandpoint, ID vs Fairfield, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sandpoint, ID vs Fairfield, AL.
| Data | Sandpoint | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,777 | 9,690 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 30.7 years |
| Median Income | $60,208 | $45,646 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Sandpoint vs Fairfield
- In Sandpoint, the population is higher at 9,777, compared to 9,690 in Fairfield.
- Residents in Sandpoint have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 30.7 years in Fairfield.
- Sandpoint has a higher median income of $60,208 compared to $45,646 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sandpoint at 35.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 30%, compared to 10% in Sandpoint.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Sandpoint.
Demographics
Demographics Sandpoint vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sandpoint | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 95 |
| White | 85 | 3 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sandpoint vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 95% compared to 0% in Sandpoint.
- Sandpoint has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 3% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Sandpoint at 1% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sandpoint at 7% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sandpoint at 7% compared to 2% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sandpoint and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sandpoint | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 11.7% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 48.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sandpoint vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.8% in Sandpoint.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sandpoint at 23.8% compared to 19.6% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 17.9% in Sandpoint.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sandpoint at 16.4% compared to 11.7% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 48.1% compared to 32.5% in Sandpoint.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Sandpoint.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sandpoint | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (244) | 0.5% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (1,005) | 22.3% (2,159) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (1,249) | 3.1% (302) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (2,370) | 14.8% (1,437) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sandpoint vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandpoint have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.5% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 10.3% in Sandpoint.
- More residents in Sandpoint have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 3.1% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandpoint hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 14.8% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.