Demographics details for Sandpoint, ID vs Fairborn, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sandpoint, ID vs Fairborn, OH.
| Data | Sandpoint | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,777 | 34,977 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $60,208 | $53,783 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Sandpoint vs Fairborn
- The population in Fairborn is higher at 34,977, compared to 9,777 in Sandpoint.
- Residents in Sandpoint have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 35.1 years in Fairborn.
- Sandpoint has a higher median income of $60,208 compared to $53,783 in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sandpoint at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Fairborn.
- Sandpoint has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Sandpoint.
Demographics
Demographics Sandpoint vs Fairborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sandpoint | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 85 | 78 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sandpoint vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Sandpoint.
- Sandpoint has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 78% in Fairborn.
- Both Sandpoint and Fairborn have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sandpoint at 7% compared to 4% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairborn at 8%, compared to 7% in Sandpoint.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sandpoint and Fairborn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sandpoint | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sandpoint vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.8% in Sandpoint.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sandpoint at 23.8% compared to 23.4% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 17.9% in Sandpoint.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sandpoint at 16.4% compared to 16.3% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 32.5% in Sandpoint.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairborn at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Sandpoint.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sandpoint | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (244) | 0.3% (116) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (1,005) | 13.2% (4,620) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (1,249) | 12.5% (4,382) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (2,370) | 19.4% (6,782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sandpoint vs Fairborn
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandpoint have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.3% in Fairborn.
- In Fairborn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 10.3% in Sandpoint.
- More residents in Sandpoint have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 12.5% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandpoint hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 19.4% in Fairborn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.