Demographics details for Sand springs, OK vs Farmington, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sand springs, OK vs Farmington, NM.
Data | Sand springs | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,031 | 46,127 |
Median Age | 36.6 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $70,431 | $61,388 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Sand springs vs Farmington
- The population in Farmington is higher at 46,127, compared to 20,031 in Sand springs.
- Residents in Sand springs have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
- Sand springs has a higher median income of $70,431 compared to $61,388 in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sand springs at 41.0% compared to 34.0% in Farmington.
- The poverty level is higher in Farmington at 10%, compared to 9% in Sand springs.
- Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.8% in Sand springs.
Demographics
Demographics Sand springs vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sand springs | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 76 | 32 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 26 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
American Indian | 7 | 29 |
Demographics Comparison: Sand springs vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sand springs at 2% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- Sand springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 32% in Farmington.
- Both Sand springs and Farmington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 5% in Sand springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Farmington at 11%, compared to 9% in Sand springs.
- In Farmington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 29%, compared to 7% in Sand springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sand springs | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.7% |
Depression | 26.9% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 18.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 13.5% |
Obesity | 35.7% | 34.4% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sand springs vs Farmington
- More residents in Sand springs report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.6% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sand springs at 26.9% compared to 20.1% in Farmington.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Sand springs and Farmington at 18.2%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sand springs at 15.0% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sand springs at 35.7% compared to 34.4% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sand springs at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sand springs | Farmington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (98) | 0.5% (211) |
High School Diploma | 16.8% (3,364) | 13.4% (6,180) |
Less than High School | 11.3% (2,260) | 12.9% (5,929) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (3,042) | 13.0% (5,985) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sand springs vs Farmington
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sand springs and Farmington at 0.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sand springs hold a high school diploma at 16.8% compared to 13.4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Farmington at 12.9%, compared to 11.3% in Sand springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sand springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 13.0% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.