Demographics details for Sand lake, MI vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sand lake, MI vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Sand lake | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,178 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 59.6 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $46,250 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Sand lake vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 1,178 in Sand lake.
- Residents in Sand lake have a higher median age of 59.6 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Provo has a higher median income of $57,943, compared to $46,250 in Sand lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sand lake at 52.0% compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- The poverty level is higher in Provo at 11%, compared to 9% in Sand lake.
- The unemployment rate in Sand lake is higher at 4.1%, compared to 4.0% in Provo.
Demographics
Demographics Sand lake vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sand lake | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 96 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sand lake vs Provo
- In Provo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Sand lake.
- Sand lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 69% in Provo.
- In Provo, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Sand lake.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2% in Sand lake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 2% in Sand lake.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sand lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sand lake | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 28.1% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | 40.1% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sand lake vs Provo
- More residents in Sand lake report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 16.3% in Provo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sand lake at 28.1% compared to 24.5% in Provo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sand lake at 24.0% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sand lake at 17.8% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sand lake at 40.1% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sand lake at 28.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sand lake | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (7) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 27.5% (324) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (260) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.4% (146) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sand lake vs Provo
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sand lake and Provo at 0.6%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sand lake hold a high school diploma at 27.5% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Sand lake have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- In Provo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 12.4% in Sand lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.