Demographics details for Sand coulee, MT vs Westminster, VT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sand coulee, MT vs Westminster, VT.

Data Sand coulee Westminster
Population 223 2,998
Median Age 43.9 years 42.0 years
Median Income $74,091 $61,000
Married Families 54.0% 55.0%
Poverty Level 7% 9%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 2.8

Population Comparison: Sand coulee vs Westminster

  • The population in Westminster is higher at 2,998, compared to 223 in Sand coulee.
  • Residents in Sand coulee have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 42.0 years in Westminster.
  • Sand coulee has a higher median income of $74,091 compared to $61,000 in Westminster.
  • In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 54.0% in Sand coulee.
  • The poverty level is higher in Westminster at 9%, compared to 7% in Sand coulee.
  • Westminster has a higher unemployment rate at 2.8% compared to 2.5% in Sand coulee.

Demographics

Demographics Sand coulee vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sand coulee Westminster
Black Data is updating 1
White 83 97
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 2
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Westminster

  • In Westminster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Sand coulee.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Westminster at 97% compared to 83% in Sand coulee.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sand coulee at 1% compared to 0% in Westminster.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sand coulee at 8% compared to 2% in Westminster.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sand coulee at 8% compared to 0% in Westminster.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sand coulee and Westminster at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sand coulee Westminster
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% Data is updating%
Depression 24.3% Data is updating%
Smoking 17.5% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 22.4% Data is updating%
Obesity 34.6% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 9.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Westminster

  • More residents in Sand coulee report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Westminster.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sand coulee at 24.3% compared to 0.0% in Westminster.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sand coulee at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Westminster.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sand coulee at 22.4% compared to 0.0% in Westminster.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sand coulee at 34.6% compared to 0.0% in Westminster.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sand coulee at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Westminster.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sand coulee Westminster
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 22.0% (49) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 16.1% (36) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.9% (51) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Sand coulee vs Westminster

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sand coulee and Westminster at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sand coulee hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Westminster.
  • More residents in Sand coulee have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Westminster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sand coulee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 0.0% in Westminster.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.