Demographics details for Sand coulee, MT vs Weatherford, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sand coulee, MT vs Weatherford, OK.

Data Sand coulee Weatherford
Population 223 11,859
Median Age 43.9 years 23.9 years
Median Income $74,091 $47,851
Married Families 54.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 7% 15%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Sand coulee vs Weatherford

  • The population in Weatherford is higher at 11,859, compared to 223 in Sand coulee.
  • Residents in Sand coulee have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 23.9 years in Weatherford.
  • Sand coulee has a higher median income of $74,091 compared to $47,851 in Weatherford.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sand coulee at 54.0% compared to 28.0% in Weatherford.
  • The poverty level is higher in Weatherford at 15%, compared to 7% in Sand coulee.
  • Weatherford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Sand coulee.

Demographics

Demographics Sand coulee vs Weatherford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sand coulee Weatherford
Black Data is updating 3
White 83 66
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 8 14
Two or More Races 8 11
American Indian Data is updating 4

Demographics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Weatherford

  • In Weatherford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Sand coulee.
  • Sand coulee has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 66% in Weatherford.
  • In Weatherford, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Sand coulee.
  • Weatherford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 8% in Sand coulee.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Weatherford at 11%, compared to 8% in Sand coulee.
  • In Weatherford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Sand coulee.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sand coulee Weatherford
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 12.3%
Depression 24.3% 25.5%
Smoking 17.5% 18.6%
Binge Drinking 22.4% 14.4%
Obesity 34.6% 44.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Weatherford

  • In Weatherford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.3% in Sand coulee.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Weatherford at 25.5% versus 24.3% in Sand coulee.
  • Weatherford has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 17.5% in Sand coulee.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sand coulee at 22.4% compared to 14.4% in Weatherford.
  • Weatherford has higher obesity rates at 44.1% compared to 34.6% in Sand coulee.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Weatherford at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Sand coulee.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sand coulee Weatherford
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (48)
High School Diploma 22.0% (49) 9.1% (1,082)
Less than High School 16.1% (36) 5.2% (621)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.9% (51) 18.9% (2,246)

Education Levels Comparison: Sand coulee vs Weatherford

  • In Weatherford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Sand coulee.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sand coulee hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 9.1% in Weatherford.
  • More residents in Sand coulee have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 5.2% in Weatherford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sand coulee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 18.9% in Weatherford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.