Demographics details for Sand coulee, MT vs Waurika, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sand coulee, MT vs Waurika, OK.
Data | Sand coulee | Waurika |
---|---|---|
Population | 223 | 1,852 |
Median Age | 43.9 years | 38.3 years |
Median Income | $74,091 | $40,197 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Sand coulee vs Waurika
- The population in Waurika is higher at 1,852, compared to 223 in Sand coulee.
- Residents in Sand coulee have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 38.3 years in Waurika.
- Sand coulee has a higher median income of $74,091 compared to $40,197 in Waurika.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sand coulee at 54.0% compared to 30.0% in Waurika.
- The poverty level is higher in Waurika at 15%, compared to 7% in Sand coulee.
- Waurika has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Sand coulee.
Demographics
Demographics Sand coulee vs Waurika provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sand coulee | Waurika |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 83 | 79 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Waurika
- In Waurika, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Sand coulee.
- Sand coulee has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 79% in Waurika.
- The Asian population is larger in Sand coulee at 1% compared to 0% in Waurika.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Sand coulee and Waurika at 8%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waurika at 11%, compared to 8% in Sand coulee.
- In Waurika, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sand coulee.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sand coulee | Waurika |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 19.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 14.2% |
Depression | 24.3% | 26.1% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 22.8% |
Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 14.3% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 41.4% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Waurika
- In Waurika, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 16.3% in Sand coulee.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waurika at 26.1% versus 24.3% in Sand coulee.
- Waurika has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 17.5% in Sand coulee.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sand coulee at 22.4% compared to 14.3% in Waurika.
- Waurika has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 34.6% in Sand coulee.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waurika at 28.0% compared to 9.0% in Sand coulee.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sand coulee | Waurika |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (5) |
High School Diploma | 22.0% (49) | 20.5% (380) |
Less than High School | 16.1% (36) | 15.7% (291) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (51) | 10.3% (191) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sand coulee vs Waurika
- In Waurika, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Sand coulee.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sand coulee hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 20.5% in Waurika.
- More residents in Sand coulee have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 15.7% in Waurika.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sand coulee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 10.3% in Waurika.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.