Demographics details for Sand coulee, MT vs Pesotum, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sand coulee, MT vs Pesotum, IL.
| Data | Sand coulee | Pesotum |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 223 | 547 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $74,091 | $80,938 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Sand coulee vs Pesotum
- The population in Pesotum is higher at 547, compared to 223 in Sand coulee.
- Residents in Sand coulee have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 43.6 years in Pesotum.
- Pesotum has a higher median income of $80,938, compared to $74,091 in Sand coulee.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sand coulee at 54.0% compared to 42.0% in Pesotum.
- Sand coulee has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Pesotum.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Sand coulee and Pesotum at 2.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Sand coulee vs Pesotum provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sand coulee | Pesotum |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 83 | 95 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Pesotum
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sand coulee and Pesotum at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pesotum at 95% compared to 83% in Sand coulee.
- The Asian population is larger in Sand coulee at 1% compared to 0% in Pesotum.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sand coulee at 8% compared to 2% in Pesotum.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sand coulee at 8% compared to 2% in Pesotum.
- In Pesotum, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sand coulee.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sand coulee | Pesotum |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 30.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Pesotum
- More residents in Sand coulee report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.5% in Pesotum.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sand coulee at 24.3% compared to 21.9% in Pesotum.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sand coulee at 17.5% compared to 15.0% in Pesotum.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sand coulee at 22.4% compared to 19.0% in Pesotum.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sand coulee at 34.6% compared to 30.9% in Pesotum.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pesotum at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Sand coulee.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sand coulee | Pesotum |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (49) | 26.1% (143) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (36) | 4.4% (24) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (51) | 16.5% (90) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sand coulee vs Pesotum
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sand coulee and Pesotum at 0.0%.
- In Pesotum, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 22.0% in Sand coulee.
- More residents in Sand coulee have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 4.4% in Pesotum.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sand coulee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 16.5% in Pesotum.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.