Demographics details for Sand coulee, MT vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sand coulee, MT vs Friendship, WI.
Data | Sand coulee | Friendship |
---|---|---|
Population | 223 | 681 |
Median Age | 43.9 years | 50.3 years |
Median Income | $74,091 | $45,208 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Sand coulee vs Friendship
- The population in Friendship is higher at 681, compared to 223 in Sand coulee.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 43.9 years in Sand coulee.
- Sand coulee has a higher median income of $74,091 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sand coulee at 54.0% compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
- The poverty level is higher in Friendship at 12%, compared to 7% in Sand coulee.
- Friendship has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Sand coulee.
Demographics
Demographics Sand coulee vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sand coulee | Friendship |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 5 |
White | 83 | 84 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Friendship
- In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Sand coulee.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Friendship at 84% compared to 83% in Sand coulee.
- The Asian population is larger in Sand coulee at 1% compared to 0% in Friendship.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sand coulee at 8% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Friendship at 9%, compared to 8% in Sand coulee.
- In Friendship, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sand coulee.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sand coulee | Friendship |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 12.4% |
Depression | 24.3% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 23.9% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Friendship
- In Friendship, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.3% in Sand coulee.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.3%.
- Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 17.5% in Sand coulee.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 22.4% in Sand coulee.
- Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 34.6% in Sand coulee.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Sand coulee.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sand coulee | Friendship |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (3) |
High School Diploma | 22.0% (49) | 26.9% (183) |
Less than High School | 16.1% (36) | 26.0% (177) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (51) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sand coulee vs Friendship
- In Friendship, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Sand coulee.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 22.0% in Sand coulee.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 16.1% in Sand coulee.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sand coulee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.