Demographics details for Sand coulee, MT vs Ehrhardt, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sand coulee, MT vs Ehrhardt, SC.
| Data | Sand coulee | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 223 | 438 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 63.5 years |
| Median Income | $74,091 | $35,923 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 56.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Sand coulee vs Ehrhardt
- The population in Ehrhardt is higher at 438, compared to 223 in Sand coulee.
- The median age in Ehrhardt is higher at 63.5 years, compared to 43.9 years in Sand coulee.
- Sand coulee has a higher median income of $74,091 compared to $35,923 in Ehrhardt.
- In Ehrhardt, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 54.0% in Sand coulee.
- The poverty level is higher in Ehrhardt at 19%, compared to 7% in Sand coulee.
- Ehrhardt has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.5% in Sand coulee.
Demographics
Demographics Sand coulee vs Ehrhardt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sand coulee | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 50 |
| White | 83 | 50 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Ehrhardt
- In Ehrhardt, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 50% compared to 0% in Sand coulee.
- Sand coulee has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 50% in Ehrhardt.
- The Asian population is larger in Sand coulee at 1% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sand coulee at 8% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sand coulee at 8% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sand coulee and Ehrhardt at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sand coulee | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sand coulee vs Ehrhardt
- In Ehrhardt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.3% in Sand coulee.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sand coulee at 24.3% compared to 20.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Ehrhardt has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 17.5% in Sand coulee.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sand coulee at 22.4% compared to 16.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Ehrhardt has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 34.6% in Sand coulee.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ehrhardt at 30.0% compared to 9.0% in Sand coulee.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sand coulee | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.0% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (49) | 26.9% (118) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (36) | 23.5% (103) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (51) | 27.2% (119) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sand coulee vs Ehrhardt
- In Ehrhardt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Sand coulee.
- In Ehrhardt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 22.0% in Sand coulee.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ehrhardt at 23.5%, compared to 16.1% in Sand coulee.
- In Ehrhardt, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.2% compared to 22.9% in Sand coulee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.