Demographics details for Sanborn, NY vs Union grove, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanborn, NY vs Union grove, AL.
Data | Sanborn | Union grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,499 | 69 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 52.9 years |
Median Income | $75,109 | $81,875 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sanborn vs Union grove
- In Sanborn, the population is higher at 1,499, compared to 69 in Union grove.
- The median age in Union grove is higher at 52.9 years, compared to 35.2 years in Sanborn.
- Union grove has a higher median income of $81,875, compared to $75,109 in Sanborn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sanborn at 34.0% compared to 28.0% in Union grove.
- Sanborn has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Union grove.
- The unemployment rate in Sanborn is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Union grove.
Demographics
Demographics Sanborn vs Union grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sanborn | Union grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 94 | 95 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanborn vs Union grove
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sanborn and Union grove at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Union grove at 95% compared to 94% in Sanborn.
- Both Sanborn and Union grove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Union grove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Sanborn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanborn at 4% compared to 1% in Union grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sanborn and Union grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sanborn | Union grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 10.9% |
Depression | 24.9% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 17.7% | 15.7% |
Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 31.4% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 33.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanborn vs Union grove
- In Union grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.5% in Sanborn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sanborn at 24.9% compared to 22.6% in Union grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanborn at 17.7% compared to 15.7% in Union grove.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanborn at 20.0% compared to 18.1% in Union grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sanborn at 32.9% compared to 31.4% in Union grove.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union grove at 33.0% compared to 9.0% in Sanborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sanborn | Union grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.9% (58) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.6% (294) | 40.6% (28) |
Less than High School | 16.0% (240) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (209) | 11.6% (8) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanborn vs Union grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanborn have no formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
- In Union grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 40.6% compared to 19.6% in Sanborn.
- More residents in Sanborn have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 11.6% in Union grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.