Demographics details for Sanborn, NY vs Big springs, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanborn, NY vs Big springs, NE.
| Data | Sanborn | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,499 | 408 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 53.5 years |
| Median Income | $75,109 | $65,694 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sanborn vs Big springs
- In Sanborn, the population is higher at 1,499, compared to 408 in Big springs.
- The median age in Big springs is higher at 53.5 years, compared to 35.2 years in Sanborn.
- Sanborn has a higher median income of $75,109 compared to $65,694 in Big springs.
- In Big springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sanborn.
- The poverty level is higher in Big springs at 10%, compared to 9% in Sanborn.
- The unemployment rate in Sanborn is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Big springs.
Demographics
Demographics Sanborn vs Big springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanborn | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 75 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Sanborn vs Big springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sanborn at 1% compared to 0% in Big springs.
- Sanborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 75% in Big springs.
- Both Sanborn and Big springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Big springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 1% in Sanborn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Big springs at 7%, compared to 4% in Sanborn.
- In Big springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Sanborn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanborn | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 21.1% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanborn vs Big springs
- More residents in Sanborn report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.4% in Big springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sanborn at 24.9% compared to 17.8% in Big springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sanborn at 17.7% compared to 17.0% in Big springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Big springs at 21.1% compared to 20.0% in Sanborn.
- Big springs has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 32.9% in Sanborn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Big springs at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Sanborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanborn | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.9% (58) | 0.7% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (294) | 19.4% (79) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (240) | 22.1% (90) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (209) | 16.7% (68) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanborn vs Big springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanborn have no formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 0.7% in Big springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanborn hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 19.4% in Big springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Big springs at 22.1%, compared to 16.0% in Sanborn.
- In Big springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 13.9% in Sanborn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.