Demographics details for San ramon, CA vs Federal way, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in San ramon, CA vs Federal way, WA.

Data San ramon Federal way
Population 85,953 97,863
Median Age 40.5 years 37.4 years
Median Income $190,829 $80,360
Married Families 50.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 3% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 5.7

Population Comparison: San ramon vs Federal way

  • The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 85,953 in San ramon.
  • Residents in San ramon have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 37.4 years in Federal way.
  • San ramon has a higher median income of $190,829 compared to $80,360 in Federal way.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in San ramon at 50.0% compared to 39.0% in Federal way.
  • The poverty level is higher in Federal way at 9%, compared to 3% in San ramon.
  • Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.3% in San ramon.

Demographics

Demographics San ramon vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic San ramon Federal way
Black 3 17
White 33 34
Asian 48 15
Hispanic 8 19
Two or More Races 8 14
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: San ramon vs Federal way

  • In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 3% in San ramon.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Federal way at 34% compared to 33% in San ramon.
  • The Asian population is larger in San ramon at 48% compared to 15% in Federal way.
  • Federal way has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 8% in San ramon.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 8% in San ramon.
  • In Federal way, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in San ramon.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric San ramon Federal way
Mental Health Not Good 11.6% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 6.7% 10.9%
Depression 14.9% 24.7%
Smoking 6.3% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 16.5%
Obesity 18.9% 27.2%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: San ramon vs Federal way

  • In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 11.6% in San ramon.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 14.9% in San ramon.
  • Federal way has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 6.3% in San ramon.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Federal way at 16.5% compared to 16.3% in San ramon.
  • Federal way has higher obesity rates at 27.2% compared to 18.9% in San ramon.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federal way at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in San ramon.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level San ramon Federal way
No Schooling 0.7% (596) 1.8% (1,735)
High School Diploma 5.2% (4,459) 15.3% (15,003)
Less than High School 3.2% (2,726) 11.0% (10,805)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 46.6% (40,044) 21.2% (20,761)

Education Levels Comparison: San ramon vs Federal way

  • In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in San ramon.
  • In Federal way, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 5.2% in San ramon.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Federal way at 11.0%, compared to 3.2% in San ramon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in San ramon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.6% compared to 21.2% in Federal way.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.