Demographics details for San rafael, CA vs Rayland, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San rafael, CA vs Rayland, OH.
Data | San rafael | Rayland |
---|---|---|
Population | 59,971 | 384 |
Median Age | 44.0 years | 48.5 years |
Median Income | $113,839 | $56,875 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: San rafael vs Rayland
- In San rafael, the population is higher at 59,971, compared to 384 in Rayland.
- The median age in Rayland is higher at 48.5 years, compared to 44.0 years in San rafael.
- San rafael has a higher median income of $113,839 compared to $56,875 in Rayland.
- In Rayland, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 39.0% in San rafael.
- The poverty level is higher in Rayland at 16%, compared to 9% in San rafael.
- Rayland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in San rafael.
Demographics
Demographics San rafael vs Rayland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | San rafael | Rayland |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 49 | 98 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 33 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San rafael vs Rayland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San rafael at 2% compared to 0% in Rayland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rayland at 98% compared to 49% in San rafael.
- The Asian population is larger in San rafael at 6% compared to 0% in Rayland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San rafael at 33% compared to 0% in Rayland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San rafael at 9% compared to 2% in Rayland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San rafael at 1% compared to 0% in Rayland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | San rafael | Rayland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 13.6% |
Depression | 17.5% | 25.8% |
Smoking | 11.0% | 25.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 18.0% |
Obesity | 24.9% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San rafael vs Rayland
- In Rayland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 14.5% in San rafael.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rayland at 25.8% versus 17.5% in San rafael.
- Rayland has a higher smoking rate at 25.7% compared to 11.0% in San rafael.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rayland at 18.0% compared to 16.9% in San rafael.
- Rayland has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 24.9% in San rafael.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rayland at 24.0% compared to 10.0% in San rafael.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | San rafael | Rayland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.9% (1,761) | 1.0% (4) |
High School Diploma | 7.4% (4,459) | 35.4% (136) |
Less than High School | 21.6% (12,927) | 9.9% (38) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.5% (21,907) | 7.3% (28) |
Education Levels Comparison: San rafael vs Rayland
- A higher percentage of residents in San rafael have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 1.0% in Rayland.
- In Rayland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.4% compared to 7.4% in San rafael.
- More residents in San rafael have less than a high school education at 21.6% compared to 9.9% in Rayland.
- A higher percentage of residents in San rafael hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.5% compared to 7.3% in Rayland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.