Demographics details for San rafael, CA vs Kirkland, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San rafael, CA vs Kirkland, WA.
| Data | San rafael | Kirkland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 59,971 | 92,151 |
| Median Age | 44.0 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $113,839 | $135,608 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: San rafael vs Kirkland
- The population in Kirkland is higher at 92,151, compared to 59,971 in San rafael.
- Residents in San rafael have a higher median age of 44.0 years compared to 38.0 years in Kirkland.
- Kirkland has a higher median income of $135,608, compared to $113,839 in San rafael.
- In Kirkland, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 39.0% in San rafael.
- San rafael has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Kirkland.
- Kirkland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.6% in San rafael.
Demographics
Demographics San rafael vs Kirkland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San rafael | Kirkland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 49 | 64 |
| Asian | 6 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 33 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: San rafael vs Kirkland
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both San rafael and Kirkland at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kirkland at 64% compared to 49% in San rafael.
- In Kirkland, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 6% in San rafael.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San rafael at 33% compared to 8% in Kirkland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San rafael at 9% compared to 8% in Kirkland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both San rafael and Kirkland at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San rafael | Kirkland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 7.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 22.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San rafael vs Kirkland
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both San rafael and Kirkland at 14.5%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kirkland at 23.9% versus 17.5% in San rafael.
- Smoking is more prevalent in San rafael at 11.0% compared to 7.8% in Kirkland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kirkland at 18.5% compared to 16.9% in San rafael.
- Obesity rates are higher in San rafael at 24.9% compared to 22.7% in Kirkland.
- Disability percentages are higher in San rafael at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Kirkland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San rafael | Kirkland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.9% (1,761) | 0.7% (602) |
| High School Diploma | 7.4% (4,459) | 7.2% (6,680) |
| Less than High School | 21.6% (12,927) | 3.9% (3,624) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.5% (21,907) | 45.5% (41,904) |
Education Levels Comparison: San rafael vs Kirkland
- A higher percentage of residents in San rafael have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.7% in Kirkland.
- A higher percentage of residents in San rafael hold a high school diploma at 7.4% compared to 7.2% in Kirkland.
- More residents in San rafael have less than a high school education at 21.6% compared to 3.9% in Kirkland.
- In Kirkland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.5% compared to 36.5% in San rafael.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.