Demographics details for San rafael, CA vs Kirkland, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San rafael, CA vs Kirkland, IL.
Data | San rafael | Kirkland |
---|---|---|
Population | 59,971 | 1,631 |
Median Age | 44.0 years | 34.8 years |
Median Income | $113,839 | $86,950 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: San rafael vs Kirkland
- In San rafael, the population is higher at 59,971, compared to 1,631 in Kirkland.
- Residents in San rafael have a higher median age of 44.0 years compared to 34.8 years in Kirkland.
- San rafael has a higher median income of $113,839 compared to $86,950 in Kirkland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San rafael at 39.0% compared to 36.0% in Kirkland.
- San rafael has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Kirkland.
- Kirkland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in San rafael.
Demographics
Demographics San rafael vs Kirkland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | San rafael | Kirkland |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 49 | 89 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 33 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San rafael vs Kirkland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San rafael at 2% compared to 0% in Kirkland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kirkland at 89% compared to 49% in San rafael.
- The Asian population is larger in San rafael at 6% compared to 0% in Kirkland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San rafael at 33% compared to 6% in Kirkland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San rafael at 9% compared to 5% in Kirkland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San rafael at 1% compared to 0% in Kirkland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | San rafael | Kirkland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 10.5% |
Depression | 17.5% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 11.0% | 16.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 24.9% | 36.2% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San rafael vs Kirkland
- In Kirkland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 14.5% in San rafael.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kirkland at 21.8% versus 17.5% in San rafael.
- Kirkland has a higher smoking rate at 16.3% compared to 11.0% in San rafael.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kirkland at 18.8% compared to 16.9% in San rafael.
- Kirkland has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 24.9% in San rafael.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kirkland at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in San rafael.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | San rafael | Kirkland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.9% (1,761) | 0.3% (5) |
High School Diploma | 7.4% (4,459) | 12.5% (204) |
Less than High School | 21.6% (12,927) | 11.4% (186) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.5% (21,907) | 12.4% (203) |
Education Levels Comparison: San rafael vs Kirkland
- A higher percentage of residents in San rafael have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.3% in Kirkland.
- In Kirkland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.5% compared to 7.4% in San rafael.
- More residents in San rafael have less than a high school education at 21.6% compared to 11.4% in Kirkland.
- A higher percentage of residents in San rafael hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.5% compared to 12.4% in Kirkland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.