Demographics details for San mateo, CA vs Viborg, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San mateo, CA vs Viborg, SD.
Data | San mateo | Viborg |
---|---|---|
Population | 100,984 | 824 |
Median Age | 38.1 years | 50.3 years |
Median Income | $149,152 | $46,316 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: San mateo vs Viborg
- In San mateo, the population is higher at 100,984, compared to 824 in Viborg.
- The median age in Viborg is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 38.1 years in San mateo.
- San mateo has a higher median income of $149,152 compared to $46,316 in Viborg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San mateo at 44.0% compared to 31.0% in Viborg.
- The poverty level is higher in Viborg at 12%, compared to 8% in San mateo.
- The unemployment rate in San mateo is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Viborg.
Demographics
Demographics San mateo vs Viborg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | San mateo | Viborg |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 32 | 91 |
Asian | 28 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 25 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: San mateo vs Viborg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San mateo at 2% compared to 0% in Viborg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Viborg at 91% compared to 32% in San mateo.
- The Asian population is larger in San mateo at 28% compared to 0% in Viborg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San mateo at 25% compared to 4% in Viborg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San mateo at 12% compared to 4% in Viborg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both San mateo and Viborg at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | San mateo | Viborg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 9.5% |
Depression | 15.5% | 18.1% |
Smoking | 8.7% | 17.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 20.1% |
Obesity | 22.8% | 35.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San mateo vs Viborg
- In Viborg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 13.1% in San mateo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Viborg at 18.1% versus 15.5% in San mateo.
- Viborg has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 8.7% in San mateo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Viborg at 20.1% compared to 16.2% in San mateo.
- Viborg has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 22.8% in San mateo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Viborg at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in San mateo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | San mateo | Viborg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (1,834) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 8.2% (8,262) | 22.8% (188) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (11,608) | 14.2% (117) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.1% (44,508) | 14.6% (120) |
Education Levels Comparison: San mateo vs Viborg
- A higher percentage of residents in San mateo have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Viborg.
- In Viborg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 8.2% in San mateo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Viborg at 14.2%, compared to 11.5% in San mateo.
- A higher percentage of residents in San mateo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.1% compared to 14.6% in Viborg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.