Demographics details for San mateo, CA vs Richmond, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in San mateo, CA vs Richmond, VA.

Data San mateo Richmond
Population 100,984 229,395
Median Age 38.1 years 34.5 years
Median Income $149,152 $59,606
Married Families 44.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 8% 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.5

Population Comparison: San mateo vs Richmond

  • The population in Richmond is higher at 229,395, compared to 100,984 in San mateo.
  • Residents in San mateo have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 34.5 years in Richmond.
  • San mateo has a higher median income of $149,152 compared to $59,606 in Richmond.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in San mateo at 44.0% compared to 25.0% in Richmond.
  • The poverty level is higher in Richmond at 14%, compared to 8% in San mateo.
  • Richmond has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in San mateo.

Demographics

Demographics San mateo vs Richmond provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic San mateo Richmond
Black 2 44
White 32 40
Asian 28 2
Hispanic 25 8
Two or More Races 12 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: San mateo vs Richmond

  • In Richmond, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 44% compared to 2% in San mateo.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Richmond at 40% compared to 32% in San mateo.
  • The Asian population is larger in San mateo at 28% compared to 2% in Richmond.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in San mateo at 25% compared to 8% in Richmond.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in San mateo at 12% compared to 6% in Richmond.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San mateo at 1% compared to 0% in Richmond.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric San mateo Richmond
Mental Health Not Good 13.1% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 12.3%
Depression 15.5% 21.4%
Smoking 8.7% 18.3%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 18.6%
Obesity 22.8% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: San mateo vs Richmond

  • In Richmond, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 13.1% in San mateo.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Richmond at 21.4% versus 15.5% in San mateo.
  • Richmond has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 8.7% in San mateo.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Richmond at 18.6% compared to 16.2% in San mateo.
  • Richmond has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 22.8% in San mateo.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richmond at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in San mateo.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level San mateo Richmond
No Schooling 1.8% (1,834) 0.8% (1,793)
High School Diploma 8.2% (8,262) 11.6% (26,718)
Less than High School 11.5% (11,608) 10.4% (23,891)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 44.1% (44,508) 31.0% (70,999)

Education Levels Comparison: San mateo vs Richmond

  • A higher percentage of residents in San mateo have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Richmond.
  • In Richmond, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.6% compared to 8.2% in San mateo.
  • More residents in San mateo have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 10.4% in Richmond.
  • A higher percentage of residents in San mateo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.1% compared to 31.0% in Richmond.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.