Demographics details for San mateo, CA vs Jeffersonville, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in San mateo, CA vs Jeffersonville, IN.

Data San mateo Jeffersonville
Population 100,984 51,030
Median Age 38.1 years 38.6 years
Median Income $149,152 $67,566
Married Families 44.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.1

Population Comparison: San mateo vs Jeffersonville

  • In San mateo, the population is higher at 100,984, compared to 51,030 in Jeffersonville.
  • The median age in Jeffersonville is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 38.1 years in San mateo.
  • San mateo has a higher median income of $149,152 compared to $67,566 in Jeffersonville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in San mateo at 44.0% compared to 37.0% in Jeffersonville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Jeffersonville at 10%, compared to 8% in San mateo.
  • Jeffersonville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.4% in San mateo.

Demographics

Demographics San mateo vs Jeffersonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic San mateo Jeffersonville
Black 2 12
White 32 75
Asian 28 1
Hispanic 25 5
Two or More Races 12 7
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: San mateo vs Jeffersonville

  • In Jeffersonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 2% in San mateo.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Jeffersonville at 75% compared to 32% in San mateo.
  • The Asian population is larger in San mateo at 28% compared to 1% in Jeffersonville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in San mateo at 25% compared to 5% in Jeffersonville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in San mateo at 12% compared to 7% in Jeffersonville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San mateo at 1% compared to 0% in Jeffersonville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric San mateo Jeffersonville
Mental Health Not Good 13.1% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 11.7%
Depression 15.5% 23.5%
Smoking 8.7% 20.2%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 16.9%
Obesity 22.8% 40.2%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: San mateo vs Jeffersonville

  • In Jeffersonville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 13.1% in San mateo.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Jeffersonville at 23.5% versus 15.5% in San mateo.
  • Jeffersonville has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 8.7% in San mateo.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Jeffersonville at 16.9% compared to 16.2% in San mateo.
  • Jeffersonville has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 22.8% in San mateo.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jeffersonville at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in San mateo.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level San mateo Jeffersonville
No Schooling 1.8% (1,834) 0.6% (293)
High School Diploma 8.2% (8,262) 18.6% (9,472)
Less than High School 11.5% (11,608) 9.7% (4,952)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 44.1% (44,508) 16.9% (8,649)

Education Levels Comparison: San mateo vs Jeffersonville

  • A higher percentage of residents in San mateo have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Jeffersonville.
  • In Jeffersonville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 8.2% in San mateo.
  • More residents in San mateo have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 9.7% in Jeffersonville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in San mateo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.1% compared to 16.9% in Jeffersonville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.