Demographics details for San mateo, CA vs Fairfield, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San mateo, CA vs Fairfield, IA.
| Data | San mateo | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 100,984 | 9,464 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $149,152 | $44,277 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: San mateo vs Fairfield
- In San mateo, the population is higher at 100,984, compared to 9,464 in Fairfield.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 38.1 years in San mateo.
- San mateo has a higher median income of $149,152 compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San mateo at 44.0% compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 8% in San mateo.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in San mateo.
Demographics
Demographics San mateo vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San mateo | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 8 |
| White | 32 | 73 |
| Asian | 28 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: San mateo vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 2% in San mateo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield at 73% compared to 32% in San mateo.
- The Asian population is larger in San mateo at 28% compared to 9% in Fairfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San mateo at 25% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San mateo at 12% compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both San mateo and Fairfield at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San mateo | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 15.5% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 8.7% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 22.8% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San mateo vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 13.1% in San mateo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairfield at 20.1% versus 15.5% in San mateo.
- Fairfield has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 8.7% in San mateo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 16.2% in San mateo.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 22.8% in San mateo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in San mateo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San mateo | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (1,834) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (8,262) | 12.1% (1,145) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (11,608) | 6.3% (594) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.1% (44,508) | 38.1% (3,604) |
Education Levels Comparison: San mateo vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in San mateo have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.1% compared to 8.2% in San mateo.
- More residents in San mateo have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in San mateo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.1% compared to 38.1% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.