Demographics details for San marcos, CA vs Wasilla, AK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San marcos, CA vs Wasilla, AK.
| Data | San marcos | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 94,854 | 9,711 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $99,413 | $69,534 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: San marcos vs Wasilla
- In San marcos, the population is higher at 94,854, compared to 9,711 in Wasilla.
- The median age is the same in both San marcos and Wasilla at 35.9 years.
- San marcos has a higher median income of $99,413 compared to $69,534 in Wasilla.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San marcos at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Wasilla.
- San marcos has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Wasilla.
- The unemployment rate in San marcos is higher at 4.7%, compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
Demographics
Demographics San marcos vs Wasilla provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San marcos | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 31 | 74 |
| Asian | 10 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 40 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: San marcos vs Wasilla
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San marcos at 2% compared to 1% in Wasilla.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wasilla at 74% compared to 31% in San marcos.
- The Asian population is larger in San marcos at 10% compared to 3% in Wasilla.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San marcos at 40% compared to 6% in Wasilla.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San marcos at 16% compared to 9% in Wasilla.
- In Wasilla, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 1% in San marcos.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San marcos | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 11.2% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 24.2% | 35.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San marcos vs Wasilla
- In Wasilla, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.9% in San marcos.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wasilla at 23.2% versus 17.8% in San marcos.
- Wasilla has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 11.2% in San marcos.
- Binge drinking is more common in San marcos at 18.6% compared to 18.3% in Wasilla.
- Wasilla has higher obesity rates at 35.8% compared to 24.2% in San marcos.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wasilla at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in San marcos.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San marcos | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (1,684) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (9,567) | 21.1% (2,051) |
| Less than High School | 15.0% (14,213) | 5.3% (514) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (25,049) | 13.3% (1,288) |
Education Levels Comparison: San marcos vs Wasilla
- A higher percentage of residents in San marcos have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
- In Wasilla, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 10.1% in San marcos.
- More residents in San marcos have less than a high school education at 15.0% compared to 5.3% in Wasilla.
- A higher percentage of residents in San marcos hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 13.3% in Wasilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.