Demographics details for San marcos, CA vs Stow, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San marcos, CA vs Stow, OH.
| Data | San marcos | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 94,854 | 34,216 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $99,413 | $89,805 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: San marcos vs Stow
- In San marcos, the population is higher at 94,854, compared to 34,216 in Stow.
- The median age in Stow is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 35.9 years in San marcos.
- San marcos has a higher median income of $99,413 compared to $89,805 in Stow.
- In Stow, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 41.0% in San marcos.
- San marcos has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Stow.
- Stow has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.7% in San marcos.
Demographics
Demographics San marcos vs Stow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San marcos | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 31 | 89 |
| Asian | 10 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 40 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San marcos vs Stow
- In Stow, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in San marcos.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stow at 89% compared to 31% in San marcos.
- The Asian population is larger in San marcos at 10% compared to 3% in Stow.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San marcos at 40% compared to 1% in Stow.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San marcos at 16% compared to 4% in Stow.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San marcos at 1% compared to 0% in Stow.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San marcos | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 11.2% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 24.2% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San marcos vs Stow
- More residents in San marcos report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.4% in Stow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stow at 23.6% versus 17.8% in San marcos.
- Stow has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 11.2% in San marcos.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stow at 19.5% compared to 18.6% in San marcos.
- Stow has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 24.2% in San marcos.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stow at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in San marcos.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San marcos | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (1,684) | 0.6% (208) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (9,567) | 14.9% (5,110) |
| Less than High School | 15.0% (14,213) | 3.7% (1,256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (25,049) | 33.7% (11,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: San marcos vs Stow
- A higher percentage of residents in San marcos have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Stow.
- In Stow, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 10.1% in San marcos.
- More residents in San marcos have less than a high school education at 15.0% compared to 3.7% in Stow.
- In Stow, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.7% compared to 26.4% in San marcos.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.