Demographics details for San marcos, CA vs Lancaster, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San marcos, CA vs Lancaster, OH.
| Data | San marcos | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 94,854 | 41,174 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 38.4 years |
| Median Income | $99,413 | $52,716 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: San marcos vs Lancaster
- In San marcos, the population is higher at 94,854, compared to 41,174 in Lancaster.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 35.9 years in San marcos.
- San marcos has a higher median income of $99,413 compared to $52,716 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San marcos at 41.0% compared to 34.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 12%, compared to 9% in San marcos.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.7% in San marcos.
Demographics
Demographics San marcos vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San marcos | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 31 | 92 |
| Asian | 10 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 40 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San marcos vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San marcos at 2% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lancaster at 92% compared to 31% in San marcos.
- The Asian population is larger in San marcos at 10% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San marcos at 40% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San marcos at 16% compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San marcos at 1% compared to 0% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San marcos | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 11.2% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 24.2% | 46.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San marcos vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.9% in San marcos.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 26.1% versus 17.8% in San marcos.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 11.2% in San marcos.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lancaster at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in San marcos.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 46.7% compared to 24.2% in San marcos.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in San marcos.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San marcos | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (1,684) | 0.3% (125) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (9,567) | 25.5% (10,487) |
| Less than High School | 15.0% (14,213) | 10.7% (4,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (25,049) | 13.9% (5,740) |
Education Levels Comparison: San marcos vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of residents in San marcos have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.3% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 10.1% in San marcos.
- More residents in San marcos have less than a high school education at 15.0% compared to 10.7% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in San marcos hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 13.9% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.