Demographics details for San marcos, CA vs Junction city, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in San marcos, CA vs Junction city, KY.

Data San marcos Junction city
Population 94,854 2,290
Median Age 35.9 years 41.6 years
Median Income $99,413 $38,646
Married Families 41.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 9% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.0

Population Comparison: San marcos vs Junction city

  • In San marcos, the population is higher at 94,854, compared to 2,290 in Junction city.
  • The median age in Junction city is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 35.9 years in San marcos.
  • San marcos has a higher median income of $99,413 compared to $38,646 in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in San marcos at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Junction city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 9% in San marcos.
  • The unemployment rate in San marcos is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.0% in Junction city.

Demographics

Demographics San marcos vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic San marcos Junction city
Black 2 2
White 31 79
Asian 10 Data is updating
Hispanic 40 7
Two or More Races 16 12
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: San marcos vs Junction city

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both San marcos and Junction city at 2%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Junction city at 79% compared to 31% in San marcos.
  • The Asian population is larger in San marcos at 10% compared to 0% in Junction city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in San marcos at 40% compared to 7% in Junction city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in San marcos at 16% compared to 12% in Junction city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San marcos at 1% compared to 0% in Junction city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric San marcos Junction city
Mental Health Not Good 15.9% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 14.8%
Depression 17.8% 29.5%
Smoking 11.2% 23.5%
Binge Drinking 18.6% 15.1%
Obesity 24.2% 41.2%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: San marcos vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.9% in San marcos.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Junction city at 29.5% versus 17.8% in San marcos.
  • Junction city has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 11.2% in San marcos.
  • Binge drinking is more common in San marcos at 18.6% compared to 15.1% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 24.2% in San marcos.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Junction city at 27.0% compared to 9.0% in San marcos.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level San marcos Junction city
No Schooling 1.8% (1,684) 1.6% (37)
High School Diploma 10.1% (9,567) 23.9% (547)
Less than High School 15.0% (14,213) 18.0% (412)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.4% (25,049) 9.2% (211)

Education Levels Comparison: San marcos vs Junction city

  • A higher percentage of residents in San marcos have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.6% in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 10.1% in San marcos.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Junction city at 18.0%, compared to 15.0% in San marcos.
  • A higher percentage of residents in San marcos hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 9.2% in Junction city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.