Demographics details for San marcos, CA vs Clarksville, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in San marcos, CA vs Clarksville, TN.

Data San marcos Clarksville
Population 94,854 176,974
Median Age 35.9 years 30.1 years
Median Income $99,413 $62,688
Married Families 41.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.3

Population Comparison: San marcos vs Clarksville

  • The population in Clarksville is higher at 176,974, compared to 94,854 in San marcos.
  • Residents in San marcos have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 30.1 years in Clarksville.
  • San marcos has a higher median income of $99,413 compared to $62,688 in Clarksville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in San marcos at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 12%, compared to 9% in San marcos.
  • The unemployment rate in San marcos is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.3% in Clarksville.

Demographics

Demographics San marcos vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic San marcos Clarksville
Black 2 22
White 31 55
Asian 10 3
Hispanic 40 11
Two or More Races 16 9
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: San marcos vs Clarksville

  • In Clarksville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 2% in San marcos.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarksville at 55% compared to 31% in San marcos.
  • The Asian population is larger in San marcos at 10% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in San marcos at 40% compared to 11% in Clarksville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in San marcos at 16% compared to 9% in Clarksville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San marcos at 1% compared to 0% in Clarksville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric San marcos Clarksville
Mental Health Not Good 15.9% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 12.6%
Depression 17.8% 28.4%
Smoking 11.2% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 18.6% 14.8%
Obesity 24.2% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: San marcos vs Clarksville

  • In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.9% in San marcos.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 28.4% versus 17.8% in San marcos.
  • Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 11.2% in San marcos.
  • Binge drinking is more common in San marcos at 18.6% compared to 14.8% in Clarksville.
  • Clarksville has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 24.2% in San marcos.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in San marcos.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level San marcos Clarksville
No Schooling 1.8% (1,684) 0.6% (976)
High School Diploma 10.1% (9,567) 13.7% (24,180)
Less than High School 15.0% (14,213) 5.5% (9,720)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.4% (25,049) 16.7% (29,557)

Education Levels Comparison: San marcos vs Clarksville

  • A higher percentage of residents in San marcos have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Clarksville.
  • In Clarksville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 10.1% in San marcos.
  • More residents in San marcos have less than a high school education at 15.0% compared to 5.5% in Clarksville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in San marcos hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 16.7% in Clarksville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.