Demographics details for San luis, AZ vs Gardner, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San luis, AZ vs Gardner, MA.
Data | San luis | Gardner |
---|---|---|
Population | 35,770 | 20,902 |
Median Age | 31.6 years | 45.0 years |
Median Income | $46,747 | $56,974 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 24.3 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: San luis vs Gardner
- In San luis, the population is higher at 35,770, compared to 20,902 in Gardner.
- The median age in Gardner is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 31.6 years in San luis.
- Gardner has a higher median income of $56,974, compared to $46,747 in San luis.
- In Gardner, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in San luis.
- San luis has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Gardner.
- The unemployment rate in San luis is higher at 24.3%, compared to 4.6% in Gardner.
Demographics
Demographics San luis vs Gardner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | San luis | Gardner |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | -39 | 82 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 93 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 44 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San luis vs Gardner
- In Gardner, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in San luis.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gardner at 82% compared to -39% in San luis.
- In Gardner, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in San luis.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San luis at 93% compared to 8% in Gardner.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San luis at 44% compared to 5% in Gardner.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San luis at 1% compared to 0% in Gardner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | San luis | Gardner |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 18.0% | 11.1% |
Depression | 19.0% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 18.7% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 45.5% | 33.5% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San luis vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 18.6% in San luis.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gardner at 24.4% versus 19.0% in San luis.
- Smoking is more prevalent in San luis at 18.7% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 14.6% in San luis.
- Obesity rates are higher in San luis at 45.5% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gardner at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in San luis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | San luis | Gardner |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.3% (1,167) | 1.3% (276) |
High School Diploma | 9.6% (3,430) | 21.5% (4,487) |
Less than High School | 54.3% (19,437) | 16.8% (3,513) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.1% (1,836) | 15.0% (3,133) |
Education Levels Comparison: San luis vs Gardner
- A higher percentage of residents in San luis have no formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 1.3% in Gardner.
- In Gardner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 9.6% in San luis.
- More residents in San luis have less than a high school education at 54.3% compared to 16.8% in Gardner.
- In Gardner, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 5.1% in San luis.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.