Demographics details for San jose, CA vs Siloam springs, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San jose, CA vs Siloam springs, AR.
| Data | San jose | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 971,233 | 18,654 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 30.1 years |
| Median Income | $136,010 | $59,911 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: San jose vs Siloam springs
- In San jose, the population is higher at 971,233, compared to 18,654 in Siloam springs.
- Residents in San jose have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
- San jose has a higher median income of $136,010 compared to $59,911 in Siloam springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San jose at 42.0% compared to 38.0% in Siloam springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Siloam springs at 13%, compared to 11% in San jose.
- The unemployment rate in San jose is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.
Demographics
Demographics San jose vs Siloam springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San jose | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 12 | 50 |
| Asian | 39 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 32 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 20 |
| American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: San jose vs Siloam springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San jose at 3% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Siloam springs at 50% compared to 12% in San jose.
- The Asian population is larger in San jose at 39% compared to 3% in Siloam springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San jose at 32% compared to 23% in Siloam springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Siloam springs at 20%, compared to 13% in San jose.
- In Siloam springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in San jose.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San jose | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 14.7% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 8.7% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 20.6% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San jose vs Siloam springs
- In Siloam springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 13.1% in San jose.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Siloam springs at 26.0% versus 14.7% in San jose.
- Siloam springs has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 8.7% in San jose.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Siloam springs at 14.9% compared to 13.8% in San jose.
- Siloam springs has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 20.6% in San jose.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Siloam springs at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in San jose.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San jose | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (26,673) | 3.7% (681) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (100,469) | 13.5% (2,510) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (165,241) | 17.4% (3,249) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.0% (320,589) | 14.4% (2,680) |
Education Levels Comparison: San jose vs Siloam springs
- In Siloam springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 2.7% in San jose.
- In Siloam springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.5% compared to 10.3% in San jose.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Siloam springs at 17.4%, compared to 17.0% in San jose.
- A higher percentage of residents in San jose hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 14.4% in Siloam springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.