Demographics details for San jose, CA vs Murfreesboro, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San jose, CA vs Murfreesboro, TN.
| Data | San jose | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 971,233 | 162,398 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $136,010 | $70,451 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: San jose vs Murfreesboro
- In San jose, the population is higher at 971,233, compared to 162,398 in Murfreesboro.
- Residents in San jose have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
- San jose has a higher median income of $136,010 compared to $70,451 in Murfreesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San jose at 42.0% compared to 34.0% in Murfreesboro.
- San jose has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Murfreesboro.
- The unemployment rate in San jose is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.
Demographics
Demographics San jose vs Murfreesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San jose | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 17 |
| White | 12 | 66 |
| Asian | 39 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 32 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San jose vs Murfreesboro
- In Murfreesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 3% in San jose.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Murfreesboro at 66% compared to 12% in San jose.
- The Asian population is larger in San jose at 39% compared to 3% in Murfreesboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San jose at 32% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San jose at 13% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San jose at 1% compared to 0% in Murfreesboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San jose | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 14.7% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 8.7% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 20.6% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San jose vs Murfreesboro
- In Murfreesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 13.1% in San jose.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Murfreesboro at 26.5% versus 14.7% in San jose.
- Murfreesboro has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 8.7% in San jose.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Murfreesboro at 15.5% compared to 13.8% in San jose.
- Murfreesboro has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 20.6% in San jose.
- Disability percentages are the same in both San jose and Murfreesboro at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San jose | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (26,673) | 0.6% (920) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (100,469) | 10.7% (17,362) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (165,241) | 6.2% (10,101) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.0% (320,589) | 23.4% (38,019) |
Education Levels Comparison: San jose vs Murfreesboro
- A higher percentage of residents in San jose have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.6% in Murfreesboro.
- In Murfreesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.7% compared to 10.3% in San jose.
- More residents in San jose have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 6.2% in Murfreesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in San jose hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 23.4% in Murfreesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.