Demographics details for San gabriel, CA vs American fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San gabriel, CA vs American fork, UT.
Data | San gabriel | American fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 38,140 | 37,268 |
Median Age | 44.3 years | 28.0 years |
Median Income | $84,056 | $90,490 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: San gabriel vs American fork
- In San gabriel, the population is higher at 38,140, compared to 37,268 in American fork.
- Residents in San gabriel have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
- American fork has a higher median income of $90,490, compared to $84,056 in San gabriel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San gabriel at 43.0% compared to 42.0% in American fork.
- San gabriel has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in American fork.
- The unemployment rate in San gabriel is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.2% in American fork.
Demographics
Demographics San gabriel vs American fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | San gabriel | American fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 2 | 84 |
Asian | 61 | 1 |
Hispanic | 27 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San gabriel vs American fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San gabriel at 1% compared to 0% in American fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in American fork at 84% compared to 2% in San gabriel.
- The Asian population is larger in San gabriel at 61% compared to 1% in American fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San gabriel at 27% compared to 9% in American fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San gabriel at 9% compared to 6% in American fork.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both San gabriel and American fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | San gabriel | American fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 9.8% |
Depression | 11.9% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 11.0% | 6.7% |
Binge Drinking | 11.2% | 8.5% |
Obesity | 20.4% | 29.5% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San gabriel vs American fork
- In American fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 13.5% in San gabriel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in American fork at 23.4% versus 11.9% in San gabriel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in San gabriel at 11.0% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in San gabriel at 11.2% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
- American fork has higher obesity rates at 29.5% compared to 20.4% in San gabriel.
- Disability percentages are the same in both San gabriel and American fork at 8.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | San gabriel | American fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 7.6% (2,889) | 0.6% (208) |
High School Diploma | 16.2% (6,193) | 7.4% (2,742) |
Less than High School | 21.7% (8,295) | 5.7% (2,134) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.8% (10,230) | 21.3% (7,922) |
Education Levels Comparison: San gabriel vs American fork
- A higher percentage of residents in San gabriel have no formal schooling at 7.6% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in San gabriel hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
- More residents in San gabriel have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 5.7% in American fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in San gabriel hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 21.3% in American fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.