Demographics details for San francisco, CA vs Shreveport, LA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in San francisco, CA vs Shreveport, LA.

Data San francisco Shreveport
Population 808,437 180,153
Median Age 39.3 years 37.1 years
Median Income $136,689 $45,967
Married Families 38.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 12% 21%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 5.0

Population Comparison: San francisco vs Shreveport

  • In San francisco, the population is higher at 808,437, compared to 180,153 in Shreveport.
  • Residents in San francisco have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 37.1 years in Shreveport.
  • San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689 compared to $45,967 in Shreveport.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in San francisco at 38.0% compared to 29.0% in Shreveport.
  • The poverty level is higher in Shreveport at 21%, compared to 12% in San francisco.
  • Shreveport has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.6% in San francisco.

Demographics

Demographics San francisco vs Shreveport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic San francisco Shreveport
Black 5 58
White 31 33
Asian 37 2
Hispanic 16 3
Two or More Races 10 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: San francisco vs Shreveport

  • In Shreveport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 5% in San francisco.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Shreveport at 33% compared to 31% in San francisco.
  • The Asian population is larger in San francisco at 37% compared to 2% in Shreveport.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in San francisco at 16% compared to 3% in Shreveport.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in San francisco at 10% compared to 4% in Shreveport.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San francisco at 1% compared to 0% in Shreveport.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric San francisco Shreveport
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 14.4%
Depression 15.7% 24.4%
Smoking 9.2% 24.3%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 16.2%
Obesity 19.1% 42.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: San francisco vs Shreveport

  • In Shreveport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 13.4% in San francisco.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Shreveport at 24.4% versus 15.7% in San francisco.
  • Shreveport has a higher smoking rate at 24.3% compared to 9.2% in San francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in San francisco at 16.4% compared to 16.2% in Shreveport.
  • Shreveport has higher obesity rates at 42.5% compared to 19.1% in San francisco.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shreveport at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in San francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level San francisco Shreveport
No Schooling 3.0% (23,928) 1.2% (2,087)
High School Diploma 8.5% (68,418) 18.3% (33,032)
Less than High School 12.4% (99,947) 11.1% (20,070)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 50.3% (406,774) 18.6% (33,461)

Education Levels Comparison: San francisco vs Shreveport

  • A higher percentage of residents in San francisco have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.2% in Shreveport.
  • In Shreveport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 8.5% in San francisco.
  • More residents in San francisco have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 11.1% in Shreveport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in San francisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 18.6% in Shreveport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.