Demographics details for San francisco, CA vs Rudolph, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San francisco, CA vs Rudolph, WI.
| Data | San francisco | Rudolph |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 808,437 | 439 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $136,689 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: San francisco vs Rudolph
- In San francisco, the population is higher at 808,437, compared to 439 in Rudolph.
- Residents in San francisco have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 38.0 years in Rudolph.
- San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689 compared to $65,000 in Rudolph.
- In Rudolph, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 38.0% in San francisco.
- San francisco has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Rudolph.
- The unemployment rate in San francisco is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Rudolph.
Demographics
Demographics San francisco vs Rudolph provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San francisco | Rudolph |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 31 | 100 |
| Asian | 37 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 10 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San francisco vs Rudolph
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San francisco at 5% compared to 0% in Rudolph.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rudolph at 100% compared to 31% in San francisco.
- The Asian population is larger in San francisco at 37% compared to 0% in Rudolph.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San francisco at 16% compared to 0% in Rudolph.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San francisco at 10% compared to 0% in Rudolph.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San francisco at 1% compared to 0% in Rudolph.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San francisco | Rudolph |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 15.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 9.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 19.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San francisco vs Rudolph
- More residents in San francisco report poor mental health at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Rudolph.
- Depression is more prevalent in San francisco at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Rudolph.
- Smoking is more prevalent in San francisco at 9.2% compared to 0.0% in Rudolph.
- Binge drinking is more common in San francisco at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Rudolph.
- Obesity rates are higher in San francisco at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Rudolph.
- Disability percentages are higher in San francisco at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Rudolph.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San francisco | Rudolph |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (23,928) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 8.5% (68,418) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 12.4% (99,947) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 50.3% (406,774) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: San francisco vs Rudolph
- A higher percentage of residents in San francisco have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Rudolph.
- A higher percentage of residents in San francisco hold a high school diploma at 8.5% compared to 0.0% in Rudolph.
- More residents in San francisco have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 0.0% in Rudolph.
- A higher percentage of residents in San francisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 0.0% in Rudolph.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.