Demographics details for San francisco, CA vs Gwynedd valley, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in San francisco, CA vs Gwynedd valley, PA.

Data San francisco Gwynedd valley
Population 808,437 1,418
Median Age 39.3 years 48.0 years
Median Income $136,689 $112,500
Married Families 38.0% 64.0%
Poverty Level 12% 3%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 4.7

Population Comparison: San francisco vs Gwynedd valley

  • In San francisco, the population is higher at 808,437, compared to 1,418 in Gwynedd valley.
  • The median age in Gwynedd valley is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 39.3 years in San francisco.
  • San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689 compared to $112,500 in Gwynedd valley.
  • In Gwynedd valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 64.0%, compared to 38.0% in San francisco.
  • San francisco has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 3% in Gwynedd valley.
  • Gwynedd valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.6% in San francisco.

Demographics

Demographics San francisco vs Gwynedd valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic San francisco Gwynedd valley
Black 5 1
White 31 93
Asian 37 3
Hispanic 16 2
Two or More Races 10 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: San francisco vs Gwynedd valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in San francisco at 5% compared to 1% in Gwynedd valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Gwynedd valley at 93% compared to 31% in San francisco.
  • The Asian population is larger in San francisco at 37% compared to 3% in Gwynedd valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in San francisco at 16% compared to 2% in Gwynedd valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in San francisco at 10% compared to 1% in Gwynedd valley.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San francisco at 1% compared to 0% in Gwynedd valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric San francisco Gwynedd valley
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% Data is updating%
Depression 15.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 9.2% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.4% Data is updating%
Obesity 19.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 11.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: San francisco vs Gwynedd valley

  • More residents in San francisco report poor mental health at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in San francisco at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in San francisco at 9.2% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in San francisco at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in San francisco at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in San francisco at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level San francisco Gwynedd valley
No Schooling 3.0% (23,928) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 8.5% (68,418) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 12.4% (99,947) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 50.3% (406,774) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: San francisco vs Gwynedd valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in San francisco have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in San francisco hold a high school diploma at 8.5% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • More residents in San francisco have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in San francisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.