Demographics details for San francisco, CA vs Carleton, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San francisco, CA vs Carleton, MI.
| Data | San francisco | Carleton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 808,437 | 2,350 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $136,689 | $54,028 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: San francisco vs Carleton
- In San francisco, the population is higher at 808,437, compared to 2,350 in Carleton.
- Residents in San francisco have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 38.3 years in Carleton.
- San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689 compared to $54,028 in Carleton.
- In Carleton, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in San francisco.
- San francisco has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Carleton.
- The unemployment rate in San francisco is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Carleton.
Demographics
Demographics San francisco vs Carleton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San francisco | Carleton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | 31 | 84 |
| Asian | 37 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San francisco vs Carleton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San francisco at 5% compared to 1% in Carleton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carleton at 84% compared to 31% in San francisco.
- The Asian population is larger in San francisco at 37% compared to 0% in Carleton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San francisco at 16% compared to 5% in Carleton.
- Both San francisco and Carleton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 10%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San francisco at 1% compared to 0% in Carleton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San francisco | Carleton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 15.7% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 9.2% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 19.1% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San francisco vs Carleton
- In Carleton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 13.4% in San francisco.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carleton at 24.1% versus 15.7% in San francisco.
- Carleton has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 9.2% in San francisco.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carleton at 19.8% compared to 16.4% in San francisco.
- Carleton has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 19.1% in San francisco.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carleton at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in San francisco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San francisco | Carleton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (23,928) | 0.6% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 8.5% (68,418) | 30.3% (713) |
| Less than High School | 12.4% (99,947) | 20.8% (488) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 50.3% (406,774) | 6.8% (160) |
Education Levels Comparison: San francisco vs Carleton
- A higher percentage of residents in San francisco have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.6% in Carleton.
- In Carleton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.3% compared to 8.5% in San francisco.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carleton at 20.8%, compared to 12.4% in San francisco.
- A higher percentage of residents in San francisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 6.8% in Carleton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.