Demographics details for San francisco, CA vs Burnham, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San francisco, CA vs Burnham, PA.
| Data | San francisco | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 808,437 | 1,972 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $136,689 | $58,929 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: San francisco vs Burnham
- In San francisco, the population is higher at 808,437, compared to 1,972 in Burnham.
- The median age in Burnham is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 39.3 years in San francisco.
- San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689 compared to $58,929 in Burnham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San francisco at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Burnham.
- The poverty level is higher in Burnham at 14%, compared to 12% in San francisco.
- Burnham has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.6% in San francisco.
Demographics
Demographics San francisco vs Burnham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San francisco | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 3 |
| White | 31 | 94 |
| Asian | 37 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San francisco vs Burnham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San francisco at 5% compared to 3% in Burnham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burnham at 94% compared to 31% in San francisco.
- The Asian population is larger in San francisco at 37% compared to 0% in Burnham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San francisco at 16% compared to 0% in Burnham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San francisco at 10% compared to 3% in Burnham.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San francisco at 1% compared to 0% in Burnham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San francisco | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 15.7% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 9.2% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 19.1% | 35.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San francisco vs Burnham
- In Burnham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 13.4% in San francisco.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burnham at 24.6% versus 15.7% in San francisco.
- Burnham has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 9.2% in San francisco.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burnham at 18.3% compared to 16.4% in San francisco.
- Burnham has higher obesity rates at 35.5% compared to 19.1% in San francisco.
- Disability percentages are the same in both San francisco and Burnham at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San francisco | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (23,928) | 0.3% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 8.5% (68,418) | 27.1% (535) |
| Less than High School | 12.4% (99,947) | 4.1% (80) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 50.3% (406,774) | 7.5% (147) |
Education Levels Comparison: San francisco vs Burnham
- A higher percentage of residents in San francisco have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.3% in Burnham.
- In Burnham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 8.5% in San francisco.
- More residents in San francisco have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 4.1% in Burnham.
- A higher percentage of residents in San francisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 7.5% in Burnham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.