Demographics details for San clemente, CA vs Palos park, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in San clemente, CA vs Palos park, IL.

Data San clemente Palos park
Population 63,457 4,792
Median Age 44.2 years 59.5 years
Median Income $134,730 $128,370
Married Families 49.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 7% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.8 5.0

Population Comparison: San clemente vs Palos park

  • In San clemente, the population is higher at 63,457, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
  • The median age in Palos park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 44.2 years in San clemente.
  • San clemente has a higher median income of $134,730 compared to $128,370 in Palos park.
  • In Palos park, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 49.0% in San clemente.
  • San clemente has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 0% in Palos park.
  • Palos park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.8% in San clemente.

Demographics

Demographics San clemente vs Palos park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic San clemente Palos park
Black 2 3
White 64 88
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 17 3
Two or More Races 12 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: San clemente vs Palos park

  • In Palos park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in San clemente.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Palos park at 88% compared to 64% in San clemente.
  • The Asian population is larger in San clemente at 5% compared to 1% in Palos park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in San clemente at 17% compared to 3% in Palos park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in San clemente at 12% compared to 5% in Palos park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both San clemente and Palos park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric San clemente Palos park
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 13.2%
Physical Health Not Good 8.6% 8.4%
Depression 18.9% 18.5%
Smoking 8.9% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 19.0% 20.8%
Obesity 25.4% 26.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: San clemente vs Palos park

  • More residents in San clemente report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in San clemente at 18.9% compared to 18.5% in Palos park.
  • Palos park has a higher smoking rate at 11.5% compared to 8.9% in San clemente.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 19.0% in San clemente.
  • Palos park has higher obesity rates at 26.7% compared to 25.4% in San clemente.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both San clemente and Palos park at 9.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level San clemente Palos park
No Schooling 0.9% (574) 1.1% (54)
High School Diploma 8.4% (5,352) 18.2% (870)
Less than High School 7.8% (4,957) 6.0% (287)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.1% (22,911) 42.1% (2,018)

Education Levels Comparison: San clemente vs Palos park

  • In Palos park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in San clemente.
  • In Palos park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 8.4% in San clemente.
  • More residents in San clemente have less than a high school education at 7.8% compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
  • In Palos park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 36.1% in San clemente.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.