Demographics details for San angelo, TX vs Richland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San angelo, TX vs Richland, MS.
| Data | San angelo | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 99,112 | 7,297 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $65,040 | $54,753 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: San angelo vs Richland
- In San angelo, the population is higher at 99,112, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- The median age in Richland is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 34.7 years in San angelo.
- San angelo has a higher median income of $65,040 compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- In Richland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 37.0% in San angelo.
- San angelo has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Richland.
- Richland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in San angelo.
Demographics
Demographics San angelo vs Richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San angelo | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 19 |
| White | 33 | 74 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 44 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San angelo vs Richland
- In Richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 5% in San angelo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Richland at 74% compared to 33% in San angelo.
- In Richland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in San angelo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San angelo at 44% compared to 3% in Richland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San angelo at 16% compared to 2% in Richland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San angelo at 1% compared to 0% in Richland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San angelo | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San angelo vs Richland
- More residents in San angelo report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Richland.
- Depression is more prevalent in San angelo at 23.9% compared to 23.4% in Richland.
- Richland has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 16.3% in San angelo.
- Binge drinking is more common in San angelo at 18.3% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Obesity rates are higher in San angelo at 37.8% compared to 37.4% in Richland.
- Disability percentages are higher in San angelo at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Richland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San angelo | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (1,444) | 1.7% (122) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (13,867) | 12.6% (916) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (17,520) | 10.0% (732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (15,619) | 16.1% (1,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: San angelo vs Richland
- In Richland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.5% in San angelo.
- A higher percentage of residents in San angelo hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 12.6% in Richland.
- More residents in San angelo have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 10.0% in Richland.
- In Richland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 15.8% in San angelo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.