Demographics details for San angelo, TX vs Pasco, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San angelo, TX vs Pasco, WA.
| Data | San angelo | Pasco |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 99,112 | 79,315 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 30.1 years |
| Median Income | $65,040 | $75,316 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: San angelo vs Pasco
- In San angelo, the population is higher at 99,112, compared to 79,315 in Pasco.
- Residents in San angelo have a higher median age of 34.7 years compared to 30.1 years in Pasco.
- Pasco has a higher median income of $75,316, compared to $65,040 in San angelo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San angelo at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Pasco.
- San angelo has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Pasco.
- Pasco has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.1% in San angelo.
Demographics
Demographics San angelo vs Pasco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San angelo | Pasco |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 33 | 23 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 44 | 54 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 17 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: San angelo vs Pasco
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San angelo at 5% compared to 2% in Pasco.
- San angelo has a higher percentage of White residents at 33% compared to 23% in Pasco.
- In Pasco, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in San angelo.
- Pasco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 44% in San angelo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pasco at 17%, compared to 16% in San angelo.
- In Pasco, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in San angelo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San angelo | Pasco |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San angelo vs Pasco
- In Pasco, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.2% in San angelo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pasco at 24.9% versus 23.9% in San angelo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in San angelo at 16.3% compared to 15.8% in Pasco.
- Binge drinking is more common in San angelo at 18.3% compared to 15.9% in Pasco.
- Obesity rates are higher in San angelo at 37.8% compared to 36.8% in Pasco.
- Disability percentages are higher in San angelo at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Pasco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San angelo | Pasco |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (1,444) | 3.5% (2,742) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (13,867) | 10.8% (8,575) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (17,520) | 26.4% (20,937) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (15,619) | 11.0% (8,686) |
Education Levels Comparison: San angelo vs Pasco
- In Pasco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 1.5% in San angelo.
- A higher percentage of residents in San angelo hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 10.8% in Pasco.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pasco at 26.4%, compared to 17.7% in San angelo.
- A higher percentage of residents in San angelo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 11.0% in Pasco.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.