Demographics details for San angelo, TX vs Fitzgerald, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San angelo, TX vs Fitzgerald, GA.
| Data | San angelo | Fitzgerald |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 99,112 | 8,900 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $65,040 | $32,500 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: San angelo vs Fitzgerald
- In San angelo, the population is higher at 99,112, compared to 8,900 in Fitzgerald.
- The median age in Fitzgerald is higher at 35.3 years, compared to 34.7 years in San angelo.
- San angelo has a higher median income of $65,040 compared to $32,500 in Fitzgerald.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San angelo at 37.0% compared to 26.0% in Fitzgerald.
- The poverty level is higher in Fitzgerald at 18%, compared to 13% in San angelo.
- Fitzgerald has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.1% in San angelo.
Demographics
Demographics San angelo vs Fitzgerald provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San angelo | Fitzgerald |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 55 |
| White | 33 | 42 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 44 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San angelo vs Fitzgerald
- In Fitzgerald, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 5% in San angelo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fitzgerald at 42% compared to 33% in San angelo.
- Both San angelo and Fitzgerald have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San angelo at 44% compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San angelo at 16% compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San angelo at 1% compared to 0% in Fitzgerald.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San angelo | Fitzgerald |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 45.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San angelo vs Fitzgerald
- In Fitzgerald, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.2% in San angelo.
- Depression is more prevalent in San angelo at 23.9% compared to 22.4% in Fitzgerald.
- Fitzgerald has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 16.3% in San angelo.
- Binge drinking is more common in San angelo at 18.3% compared to 13.4% in Fitzgerald.
- Fitzgerald has higher obesity rates at 45.0% compared to 37.8% in San angelo.
- Disability percentages are the same in both San angelo and Fitzgerald at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San angelo | Fitzgerald |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (1,444) | 0.5% (41) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (13,867) | 32.9% (2,930) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (17,520) | 11.1% (992) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (15,619) | 9.3% (828) |
Education Levels Comparison: San angelo vs Fitzgerald
- A higher percentage of residents in San angelo have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Fitzgerald.
- In Fitzgerald, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.9% compared to 14.0% in San angelo.
- More residents in San angelo have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 11.1% in Fitzgerald.
- A higher percentage of residents in San angelo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 9.3% in Fitzgerald.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.