Demographics details for San angelo, TX vs Federal way, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San angelo, TX vs Federal way, WA.
| Data | San angelo | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 99,112 | 97,863 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $65,040 | $80,360 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: San angelo vs Federal way
- In San angelo, the population is higher at 99,112, compared to 97,863 in Federal way.
- The median age in Federal way is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 34.7 years in San angelo.
- Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360, compared to $65,040 in San angelo.
- In Federal way, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in San angelo.
- San angelo has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Federal way.
- Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.1% in San angelo.
Demographics
Demographics San angelo vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San angelo | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 17 |
| White | 33 | 34 |
| Asian | 1 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 44 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: San angelo vs Federal way
- In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 5% in San angelo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Federal way at 34% compared to 33% in San angelo.
- In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 1% in San angelo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San angelo at 44% compared to 19% in Federal way.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San angelo at 16% compared to 14% in Federal way.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both San angelo and Federal way at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San angelo | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San angelo vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 17.2% in San angelo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 23.9% in San angelo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in San angelo at 16.3% compared to 12.7% in Federal way.
- Binge drinking is more common in San angelo at 18.3% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
- Obesity rates are higher in San angelo at 37.8% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
- Disability percentages are higher in San angelo at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Federal way.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San angelo | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (1,444) | 1.8% (1,735) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (13,867) | 15.3% (15,003) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (17,520) | 11.0% (10,805) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (15,619) | 21.2% (20,761) |
Education Levels Comparison: San angelo vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.5% in San angelo.
- In Federal way, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 14.0% in San angelo.
- More residents in San angelo have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 11.0% in Federal way.
- In Federal way, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 15.8% in San angelo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.