Demographics details for San angelo, TX vs Falls church, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San angelo, TX vs Falls church, VA.
Data | San angelo | Falls church |
---|---|---|
Population | 99,112 | 14,586 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $65,040 | $164,536 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: San angelo vs Falls church
- In San angelo, the population is higher at 99,112, compared to 14,586 in Falls church.
- The median age in Falls church is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 34.7 years in San angelo.
- Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536, compared to $65,040 in San angelo.
- In Falls church, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 37.0% in San angelo.
- San angelo has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Falls church.
- The unemployment rate in San angelo is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.5% in Falls church.
Demographics
Demographics San angelo vs Falls church provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | San angelo | Falls church |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 5 |
White | 33 | 65 |
Asian | 1 | 9 |
Hispanic | 44 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San angelo vs Falls church
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both San angelo and Falls church at 5%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Falls church at 65% compared to 33% in San angelo.
- In Falls church, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in San angelo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San angelo at 44% compared to 11% in Falls church.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San angelo at 16% compared to 10% in Falls church.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San angelo at 1% compared to 0% in Falls church.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | San angelo | Falls church |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 11.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 6.5% |
Depression | 23.9% | 19.9% |
Smoking | 16.3% | 7.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 37.8% | 30.8% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San angelo vs Falls church
- More residents in San angelo report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
- Depression is more prevalent in San angelo at 23.9% compared to 19.9% in Falls church.
- Smoking is more prevalent in San angelo at 16.3% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Falls church at 18.8% compared to 18.3% in San angelo.
- Obesity rates are higher in San angelo at 37.8% compared to 30.8% in Falls church.
- Disability percentages are higher in San angelo at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | San angelo | Falls church |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (1,444) | 0.3% (50) |
High School Diploma | 14.0% (13,867) | 4.1% (597) |
Less than High School | 17.7% (17,520) | 2.7% (388) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (15,619) | 52.5% (7,660) |
Education Levels Comparison: San angelo vs Falls church
- A higher percentage of residents in San angelo have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in Falls church.
- A higher percentage of residents in San angelo hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
- More residents in San angelo have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
- In Falls church, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 15.8% in San angelo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.