Demographics details for San angelo, TX vs Carlisle, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San angelo, TX vs Carlisle, IN.
Data | San angelo | Carlisle |
---|---|---|
Population | 99,112 | 618 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 52.6 years |
Median Income | $65,040 | $49,250 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: San angelo vs Carlisle
- In San angelo, the population is higher at 99,112, compared to 618 in Carlisle.
- The median age in Carlisle is higher at 52.6 years, compared to 34.7 years in San angelo.
- San angelo has a higher median income of $65,040 compared to $49,250 in Carlisle.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San angelo at 37.0% compared to 36.0% in Carlisle.
- San angelo has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Carlisle.
- The unemployment rate in San angelo is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.2% in Carlisle.
Demographics
Demographics San angelo vs Carlisle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | San angelo | Carlisle |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 2 |
White | 33 | 93 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 44 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 16 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: San angelo vs Carlisle
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in San angelo at 5% compared to 2% in Carlisle.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carlisle at 93% compared to 33% in San angelo.
- The Asian population is larger in San angelo at 1% compared to 0% in Carlisle.
- The Hispanic community is larger in San angelo at 44% compared to 0% in Carlisle.
- More residents identify as two or more races in San angelo at 16% compared to 5% in Carlisle.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San angelo at 1% compared to 0% in Carlisle.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | San angelo | Carlisle |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.5% |
Depression | 23.9% | 27.0% |
Smoking | 16.3% | 24.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 37.8% | 37.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San angelo vs Carlisle
- In Carlisle, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.2% in San angelo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carlisle at 27.0% versus 23.9% in San angelo.
- Carlisle has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 16.3% in San angelo.
- Binge drinking is more common in San angelo at 18.3% compared to 16.7% in Carlisle.
- Obesity rates are higher in San angelo at 37.8% compared to 37.0% in Carlisle.
- Disability percentages are higher in San angelo at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Carlisle.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | San angelo | Carlisle |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (1,444) | 0.5% (3) |
High School Diploma | 14.0% (13,867) | 28.8% (178) |
Less than High School | 17.7% (17,520) | 3.9% (24) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (15,619) | 6.0% (37) |
Education Levels Comparison: San angelo vs Carlisle
- A higher percentage of residents in San angelo have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Carlisle.
- In Carlisle, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.8% compared to 14.0% in San angelo.
- More residents in San angelo have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 3.9% in Carlisle.
- A higher percentage of residents in San angelo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 6.0% in Carlisle.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.