Demographics details for Salt lake city, UT vs Beacon, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Salt lake city, UT vs Beacon, IA.

Data Salt lake city Beacon
Population 204,657 430
Median Age 32.5 years 39.6 years
Median Income $72,357 $54,250
Married Families 33.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 13% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Salt lake city vs Beacon

  • In Salt lake city, the population is higher at 204,657, compared to 430 in Beacon.
  • The median age in Beacon is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 32.5 years in Salt lake city.
  • Salt lake city has a higher median income of $72,357 compared to $54,250 in Beacon.
  • In Beacon, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 33.0% in Salt lake city.
  • Salt lake city has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Beacon.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Salt lake city and Beacon at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Salt lake city vs Beacon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Salt lake city Beacon
Black 3 3
White 63 88
Asian 5 3
Hispanic 20 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Salt lake city vs Beacon

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Salt lake city and Beacon at 3%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Beacon at 88% compared to 63% in Salt lake city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Salt lake city at 5% compared to 3% in Beacon.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Salt lake city at 20% compared to 0% in Beacon.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Salt lake city at 8% compared to 6% in Beacon.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Salt lake city at 1% compared to 0% in Beacon.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Salt lake city Beacon
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 9.8%
Depression 26.2% 18.4%
Smoking 9.2% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 21.4%
Obesity 31.8% 38.1%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Salt lake city vs Beacon

  • More residents in Salt lake city report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.4% in Beacon.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Salt lake city at 26.2% compared to 18.4% in Beacon.
  • Beacon has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 9.2% in Salt lake city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Beacon at 21.4% compared to 14.8% in Salt lake city.
  • Beacon has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 31.8% in Salt lake city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beacon at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Salt lake city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Salt lake city Beacon
No Schooling 1.3% (2,733) 0.2% (1)
High School Diploma 9.3% (19,020) 26.3% (113)
Less than High School 10.5% (21,475) 18.4% (79)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.0% (67,504) 6.0% (26)

Education Levels Comparison: Salt lake city vs Beacon

  • A higher percentage of residents in Salt lake city have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Beacon.
  • In Beacon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.3% compared to 9.3% in Salt lake city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beacon at 18.4%, compared to 10.5% in Salt lake city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Salt lake city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 6.0% in Beacon.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.