Demographics details for Sallisaw, OK vs Richmond, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sallisaw, OK vs Richmond, CA.
Data | Sallisaw | Richmond |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,540 | 216,288 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 36.0 years |
Median Income | $44,310 | $73,000 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 40000.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 0.08 |
Population Comparison: Sallisaw vs Richmond
- The population in Richmond is higher at 216,288, compared to 8,540 in Sallisaw.
- The median age in Richmond is higher at 36.0 years, compared to 35.1 years in Sallisaw.
- Richmond has a higher median income of $73,000, compared to $44,310 in Sallisaw.
- In Richmond, the percentage of married families is higher at 40000.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sallisaw.
- Sallisaw has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Richmond.
- The unemployment rate in Sallisaw is higher at 4.5%, compared to 0.08% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Sallisaw vs Richmond provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sallisaw | Richmond |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 30 |
White | 59 | 36 |
Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
Hispanic | 8 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
American Indian | 18 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sallisaw vs Richmond
- In Richmond, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 2% in Sallisaw.
- Sallisaw has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 36% in Richmond.
- In Richmond, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Sallisaw.
- Richmond has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 8% in Sallisaw.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sallisaw at 13% compared to 5% in Richmond.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sallisaw at 18% compared to 0% in Richmond.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sallisaw | Richmond |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.7% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 17.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 28.5% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 28.1% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 44.5% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sallisaw vs Richmond
- More residents in Sallisaw report poor mental health at 22.7% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sallisaw at 28.5% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sallisaw at 28.1% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sallisaw at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sallisaw at 44.5% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sallisaw at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sallisaw | Richmond |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (99) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (1,261) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 19.9% (1,701) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (884) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sallisaw vs Richmond
- A higher percentage of residents in Sallisaw have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sallisaw hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- More residents in Sallisaw have less than a high school education at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sallisaw hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.