Demographics details for Sallisaw, OK vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sallisaw, OK vs Live oak, FL.
| Data | Sallisaw | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,540 | 7,034 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $44,310 | $43,664 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Sallisaw vs Live oak
- In Sallisaw, the population is higher at 8,540, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- The median age in Live oak is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 35.1 years in Sallisaw.
- Sallisaw has a higher median income of $44,310 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sallisaw at 34.0% compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- The poverty level is higher in Live oak at 16%, compared to 12% in Sallisaw.
- The unemployment rate in Sallisaw is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Live oak.
Demographics
Demographics Sallisaw vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sallisaw | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 38 |
| White | 59 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 12 |
| American Indian | 18 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sallisaw vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 2% in Sallisaw.
- Sallisaw has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- Both Sallisaw and Live oak have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Live oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 8% in Sallisaw.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sallisaw at 13% compared to 12% in Live oak.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sallisaw at 18% compared to 0% in Live oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sallisaw | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.7% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.3% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 28.1% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 44.5% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sallisaw vs Live oak
- More residents in Sallisaw report poor mental health at 22.7% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sallisaw at 28.5% compared to 19.3% in Live oak.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sallisaw at 28.1% compared to 22.3% in Live oak.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Live oak at 14.9% compared to 13.0% in Sallisaw.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sallisaw at 44.5% compared to 37.1% in Live oak.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sallisaw at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sallisaw | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (99) | 2.1% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (1,261) | 25.0% (1,755) |
| Less than High School | 19.9% (1,701) | 11.3% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (884) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sallisaw vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.2% in Sallisaw.
- In Live oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 14.8% in Sallisaw.
- More residents in Sallisaw have less than a high school education at 19.9% compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sallisaw hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.