Demographics details for Sallisaw, OK vs Jefferson city, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sallisaw, OK vs Jefferson city, MO.

Data Sallisaw Jefferson city
Population 8,540 42,528
Median Age 35.1 years 38.5 years
Median Income $44,310 $63,649
Married Families 34.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 12% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.9

Population Comparison: Sallisaw vs Jefferson city

  • The population in Jefferson city is higher at 42,528, compared to 8,540 in Sallisaw.
  • The median age in Jefferson city is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 35.1 years in Sallisaw.
  • Jefferson city has a higher median income of $63,649, compared to $44,310 in Sallisaw.
  • In Jefferson city, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sallisaw.
  • Sallisaw has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Jefferson city.
  • The unemployment rate in Sallisaw is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in Jefferson city.

Demographics

Demographics Sallisaw vs Jefferson city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sallisaw Jefferson city
Black 2 18
White 59 72
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 8 3
Two or More Races 13 4
American Indian 18 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sallisaw vs Jefferson city

  • In Jefferson city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 2% in Sallisaw.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Jefferson city at 72% compared to 59% in Sallisaw.
  • In Jefferson city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Sallisaw.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sallisaw at 8% compared to 3% in Jefferson city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sallisaw at 13% compared to 4% in Jefferson city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sallisaw at 18% compared to 0% in Jefferson city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sallisaw Jefferson city
Mental Health Not Good 22.7% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 17.3% 11.6%
Depression 28.5% 22.6%
Smoking 28.1% 18.6%
Binge Drinking 13.0% 16.9%
Obesity 44.5% 37.4%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sallisaw vs Jefferson city

  • More residents in Sallisaw report poor mental health at 22.7% compared to 17.1% in Jefferson city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sallisaw at 28.5% compared to 22.6% in Jefferson city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sallisaw at 28.1% compared to 18.6% in Jefferson city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Jefferson city at 16.9% compared to 13.0% in Sallisaw.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sallisaw at 44.5% compared to 37.4% in Jefferson city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sallisaw at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Jefferson city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sallisaw Jefferson city
No Schooling 1.2% (99) 0.5% (233)
High School Diploma 14.8% (1,261) 15.9% (6,767)
Less than High School 19.9% (1,701) 11.0% (4,659)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.4% (884) 24.8% (10,543)

Education Levels Comparison: Sallisaw vs Jefferson city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sallisaw have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Jefferson city.
  • In Jefferson city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.9% compared to 14.8% in Sallisaw.
  • More residents in Sallisaw have less than a high school education at 19.9% compared to 11.0% in Jefferson city.
  • In Jefferson city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 10.4% in Sallisaw.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.