Demographics details for Saint marys, PA vs Markleeville, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Saint marys, PA vs Markleeville, CA.

Data Saint marys Markleeville
Population 12,520 163
Median Age 50.5 years 64.6 years
Median Income $61,364 $93,333
Married Families 43.0% 63.0%
Poverty Level 9% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Saint marys vs Markleeville

  • In Saint marys, the population is higher at 12,520, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
  • The median age in Markleeville is higher at 64.6 years, compared to 50.5 years in Saint marys.
  • Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333, compared to $61,364 in Saint marys.
  • In Markleeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 63.0%, compared to 43.0% in Saint marys.
  • Saint marys has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • The unemployment rate in Saint marys is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Markleeville.

Demographics

Demographics Saint marys vs Markleeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Saint marys Markleeville
Black 1 Data is updating
White 95 77
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 23
Two or More Races 3 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Saint marys vs Markleeville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Saint marys at 1% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • Saint marys has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 77% in Markleeville.
  • Both Saint marys and Markleeville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Markleeville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 1% in Saint marys.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Saint marys at 3% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Saint marys and Markleeville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Saint marys Markleeville
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.2% 12.0%
Depression 23.8% 23.0%
Smoking 19.4% 15.4%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 17.1%
Obesity 34.4% 30.0%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Saint marys vs Markleeville

  • In Markleeville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.8% in Saint marys.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Saint marys at 23.8% compared to 23.0% in Markleeville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Saint marys at 19.4% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Saint marys at 18.7% compared to 17.1% in Markleeville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Saint marys at 34.4% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Saint marys and Markleeville at 17.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Saint marys Markleeville
No Schooling 0.5% (62) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 36.9% (4,616) 19.6% (32)
Less than High School 9.3% (1,170) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.1% (1,895) 35.6% (58)

Education Levels Comparison: Saint marys vs Markleeville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Saint marys have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Saint marys hold a high school diploma at 36.9% compared to 19.6% in Markleeville.
  • More residents in Saint marys have less than a high school education at 9.3% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • In Markleeville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 15.1% in Saint marys.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.