Demographics details for Saint marks, FL vs Seattle, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Saint marks, FL vs Seattle, WA.
Data | Saint marks | Seattle |
---|---|---|
Population | 295 | 749,256 |
Median Age | 60.1 years | 35.4 years |
Median Income | $47,500 | $116,068 |
Married Families | 51.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Saint marks vs Seattle
- The population in Seattle is higher at 749,256, compared to 295 in Saint marks.
- Residents in Saint marks have a higher median age of 60.1 years compared to 35.4 years in Seattle.
- Seattle has a higher median income of $116,068, compared to $47,500 in Saint marks.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Saint marks at 51.0% compared to 35.0% in Seattle.
- The poverty level is higher in Seattle at 9%, compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- Seattle has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.5% in Saint marks.
Demographics
Demographics Saint marks vs Seattle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Saint marks | Seattle |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 7 |
White | 98 | 59 |
Asian | Data is updating | 17 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 7 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Saint marks vs Seattle
- In Seattle, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- Saint marks has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 59% in Seattle.
- In Seattle, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 0% in Saint marks.
- Seattle has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Seattle at 9%, compared to 2% in Saint marks.
- In Seattle, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Saint marks.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Saint marks | Seattle |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 8.5% |
Depression | 23.2% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 25.2% | 8.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 31.9% | 23.8% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Saint marks vs Seattle
- More residents in Saint marks report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.1% in Seattle.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Seattle at 23.6% versus 23.2% in Saint marks.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Saint marks at 25.2% compared to 8.6% in Seattle.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Seattle at 17.6% compared to 17.4% in Saint marks.
- Obesity rates are higher in Saint marks at 31.9% compared to 23.8% in Seattle.
- Disability percentages are higher in Saint marks at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Seattle.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Saint marks | Seattle |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (6,839) |
High School Diploma | 23.7% (70) | 5.8% (43,106) |
Less than High School | 9.5% (28) | 4.7% (35,004) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.1% (12) | 49.4% (369,798) |
Education Levels Comparison: Saint marks vs Seattle
- In Seattle, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Saint marks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Saint marks hold a high school diploma at 23.7% compared to 5.8% in Seattle.
- More residents in Saint marks have less than a high school education at 9.5% compared to 4.7% in Seattle.
- In Seattle, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.4% compared to 4.1% in Saint marks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.